What should the therapist do if the couple becomes gridlocked when discussing a problem during the Compromise intervention?

When a couple becomes gridlocked during the Compromise intervention, transitioning into a Dreams Within Conflict approach can be highly beneficial. This technique allows the therapist to delve deeper into the underlying dreams, aspirations, and values that are at the root of the conflict. By exploring these broader themes, the couple can often discover the personal meanings behind their positions, which may help them to find common ground and foster a more meaningful connection.

Gridlock typically indicates that there are fundamental differences or unmet needs at play. Within the Dreams Within Conflict approach, the therapist encourages partners to express their hopes and dreams and helps them understand how these relate to their gridlocked issues. This process can lead to the development of a deeper appreciation for each other's perspectives, ultimately paving the way for more effective negotiation and compromise.

The other options, while potentially useful in different contexts, do not specifically address the need to explore deeper emotional content when a couple finds themselves stuck in conflict. Choosing a solvable problem may skip over the necessary exploration of deeper needs, while using strategies from Dan Wile may not fit within the specific context of gridlock. Redrawing compromise ovals could imply a re-evaluation of a surface-level agreement without addressing the underlying emotional layers that are causing the impasse. Therefore,